Do Photos Add Value to a Book?
- schlesadv
- Jan 24
- 1 min read
Yes—when used intentionally, photos can significantly enhance the reading experience. When used poorly or excessively, they can distract or even cheapen the book. The value depends on genre, purpose, and execution.
When Photos Add Value
1. Nonfiction & Memoir
Photos are often a net positive when they:
Establish credibility (the author was really there)
Humanize the story (faces, places, moments)
Clarify context (historical events, timelines, transformations)
Examples where photos help:
Memoirs and autobiographies
History, biography, travel, true crime
Self-help books involving transformation (before/after, real-world examples)
2. Instructional & Reference Books
Photos can:
Reduce cognitive load
Replace lengthy explanations
Improve retention
Common in:
How-to, fitness, cooking, crafts
Science and technical nonfiction
Field guides3. Selective Use in Fiction
Photos are rare in fiction, but effective when:
Supporting world-building (maps, documents, artifacts)
Reinforcing atmosphere (epistolary novels, experimental fiction)
Anchoring realism in historical or documentary-style narratives
They should never replace imagination, only guide it.
When Photos Hurt the Experience
They interrupt narrative flow
They tell instead of show
They’re low resolution or poorly printed
There are too many (reader fatigue)
They feel like filler rather than story-relevant
In fiction especially, overuse can break immersion.
Print vs. Digital Considerations
Print
Black-and-white photos are usually preferred (cleaner, cheaper, timeless)
Inserted photo sections often work better than scattered images
Ebook
Photos are easier to include but risk layout issues
Captions matter more than placement
A Practical Rule
Ask of every image:
Does this deepen understanding or emotion in a way words alone cannot?
If the answer is yes, it belongs.
Publishing books that matter in all genres since 2008




Comments