Is an Author Testimonial to Their Publisher More Meaningful Than a Private Email?
- schlesadv
- Apr 20
- 1 min read
An author testimonial printed in a book (or on your website) is far more meaningful from a marketing and credibility standpoint than one sent privately by email. It signals confidence, satisfaction, and—most importantly—willingness to attach their name to the endorsement in front of readers.
That said, they serve different purposes:
Public testimonial (in a book, on your site, in marketing materials)
Builds trust with prospective authors and readers
Acts as social proof you can reuse across platforms
Shows the author is genuinely proud of the relationship
Has long-term branding value
Private testimonial (email)
Often more candid and detailed
Useful for internal feedback and improving your process
Can be converted into a public testimonial (with permission)
Still valuable—but invisible unless you leverage it
If you had to choose one as “more meaningful,” the public one is stronger because it influences others. But the smartest approach is to treat emailed praise as raw material—then ask the author for permission to refine and publish it.
A practical move: when you receive a strong email testimonial, reply with a lightly edited version and ask, “Would you be comfortable with us sharing this on our website or in marketing materials?” That’s how you turn private appreciation into public credibility.
Publishing exceptional books of all genres for over 18 years.


Comments